Daily Mail Billed with 'Intimidating' Hugh Grant Following a Actor's Leveson Testimony

LONDON - The Leveson Inquiry was informed Tuesday that Hugh Granthas been "punished" by newspapers for his decision to speak on Monday on press invasion.our editor recommendsHugh Grant Accuses 'The Mail on Sunday' of Phone Hacking Hugh Grant's Family 'Hounded' After He Spoke Out About Phone-HackingRupert Murdoch Was Asked for by Parents of Wiped out Schoolgirl to 'Put Things Right' at News Corp. Over Phone-Hacking Barristers representing the Metropolitan Police and hacking sufferers have mentioned the actor's treatment after giving evidence under oath may very well prove "intimidating" along with other witnesses. The warning came after Connected Newspapers - the author in the Daily Mailand the Mail on Sunday- taken proper care of immediately Grant's allegation that his phone happen to be jeopardized with the Mail on Sundayby accusing him of lounging under oath. "Mr Grant's accusations are mendacious streaks driven by his hate in the media," the author mentioned in the statement that ongoing to convey it "absolutely refutes" Grant's claims that his phone happen to be jeopardized with the Mail on Sunday. GALLERY: Hollywood's Memorable Mea Culpas Responding to have an accusation the Daily Mailhad paid out off a hospital source to secure particulars concerning the current birth of his child, the paper mentioned it "positively declines" the charge. But Robert Sherborne, the an attorney representing the sufferers mentioned the newspaper was getting its energy to bully the star of four Wedding events together with a Funeraland Love Really. The thing that was filed inside the pages in the Daily Mailand the site wasn't a denial but a person attack on Mr Grant just like a witness...whatever they suggested is always that he was deliberately lounging...."mendacious means lounging." The statement came following a actor accused the Mail on Sundayof hacking his phone in 2007 throughout his evidence session for the Leveson Inquiry on Monday using what shown a hard and every once in awhile stormy evidence session. "There's a big difference between the best of reply together with the right of attack - if people you have been brave enough later on and supply evidence receive this kind of treatment then witnesses will probably be unwilling to become that brave anymore,In . Sherborne added. Metropolitan Police QC Neil Garmanechoed the concerns mentioned he was concerned that Grant's treatment would impact on other witnesses due to give evidence within the Inquiry. "Witnesses can be very careful, we fear, if it's likely that they may face that kind of treatment the following day of. Other much spoken about witnesses that are prone to give evidence personally under oath include comedian Steve Coogan, actress Sienna Millerand Harry Potter author JK Rowling. Jonathan CaplanQC, representing Connected Newspapers, mentioned the newspapers had made the statement "pressurizedInch to resolve accusations of great criminal misconduct, therefore it refutes. When asked for in regards to the personal character in the attack on Grant, Caplan told Master Justice Leveson:"I accept whatever you say." The lawyers are needed to talk about techniques to provide relevant parties the legal right to reply through the hearing periods. Related Subjects Sienna Burns Worldwide Steve Coogan Hugh Grant Phone Hacking Scandal